<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do You Want from CSS3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://browsersphere.com/2008/03/10/what-do-you-want-from-css3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://browsersphere.com/2008/03/10/what-do-you-want-from-css3/</link>
	<description>Tracking the continued evolution of web browsers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:02:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: an0n1 m0us</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2008/03/10/what-do-you-want-from-css3/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>an0n1 m0us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/2008/03/10/what-do-you-want-from-css3/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I want a standard that does not try to do too much and that browser vendors can clearly implement within a given time frame. 

The last thing the web needs is some zany feature in CSS that someone on the relevant W3C working group thinks is important but is very hard to implement. We need rock solid standards. If that means minor versions then that&#039;s fine.

I want to read: 

&quot;and Vendors A, M, Mi and O will all release new browser versions next month, making an early new years (or new decade) present for all web users. For the first time these synchronised releases will bring the CSS2.5 standard to the web in a new commitment to unified support for interoperability. This unprecedented cooperation amongst vendors has been generated by the simplification and &#039;minification&#039; of the CSS3 standard. CSS2.5 was released 12 months ago, December 11th 2008, allowing all vendors a full 12 months to implement it into the coordinated unified release cycle.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a standard that does not try to do too much and that browser vendors can clearly implement within a given time frame. </p>
<p>The last thing the web needs is some zany feature in CSS that someone on the relevant W3C working group thinks is important but is very hard to implement. We need rock solid standards. If that means minor versions then that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>I want to read: </p>
<p>&#8220;and Vendors A, M, Mi and O will all release new browser versions next month, making an early new years (or new decade) present for all web users. For the first time these synchronised releases will bring the CSS2.5 standard to the web in a new commitment to unified support for interoperability. This unprecedented cooperation amongst vendors has been generated by the simplification and &#8216;minification&#8217; of the CSS3 standard. CSS2.5 was released 12 months ago, December 11th 2008, allowing all vendors a full 12 months to implement it into the coordinated unified release cycle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
