<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Browsersphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://browsersphere.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://browsersphere.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the continued evolution of web browsers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:02:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3 RC2 Released by Mr Pest Control London</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2008/06/04/firefox-3-rc2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-10138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Pest Control London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=129#comment-10138</guid>
		<description>Bookmarked for future reference :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookmarked for future reference <img src='http://browsersphere.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #15 by Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/around-the-browsersphere-15/comment-page-1/#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=247#comment-9386</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info, Paul.  If you work out other arrangements with Microsoft, let me know and I&#039;ll post an update here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, Paul.  If you work out other arrangements with Microsoft, let me know and I&#8217;ll post an update here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #15 by Paul Scarpa</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/around-the-browsersphere-15/comment-page-1/#comment-9339</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Scarpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=247#comment-9339</guid>
		<description>Thanks for supporting Spry Hive&#039;s talk on &quot;the next generation Web browser.&quot; We didn&#039;t manage to secure the votes to present, but we are talking to Microsoft about other options for doing so. Track us @spryhive for the DL on our upcoming beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for supporting Spry Hive&#8217;s talk on &#8220;the next generation Web browser.&#8221; We didn&#8217;t manage to secure the votes to present, but we are talking to Microsoft about other options for doing so. Track us @spryhive for the DL on our upcoming beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome Ad Spotted in England by Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/08/google-chrome-ad-spotted-in-england/comment-page-1/#comment-9179</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=249#comment-9179</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another ad, this time from a newspaper: http://twitpic.com/xn98n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another ad, this time from a newspaper: <a href="http://twitpic.com/xn98n" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/xn98n</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3.6 RC1 Released by pd</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/09/firefox-3-6-rc1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-9146</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=254#comment-9146</guid>
		<description>until the improve the boot time on Windows, further improve the memory management *and* get every tab running in a separate process (not just plugins) then Firefox will not have advanced :( Adding more support for all sorts of new web author trickery is great but useless until IE supports it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>until the improve the boot time on Windows, further improve the memory management *and* get every tab running in a separate process (not just plugins) then Firefox will not have advanced <img src='http://browsersphere.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Adding more support for all sorts of new web author trickery is great but useless until IE supports it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on emoko by pd</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/08/emoko/comment-page-1/#comment-9145</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=251#comment-9145</guid>
		<description>interesting concept but can&#039;t see it taking off in that form. So the &#039;social 2.0&#039; addicted people can browse sites with crappy avatars looking at the same stuff. Ermmm, what happens when two people (avatars) want to actually &#039;touch&#039; a common site at once? Someone needs to take control and then the experience is hardly &#039;social&#039; but more dictatorial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting concept but can&#8217;t see it taking off in that form. So the &#8217;social 2.0&#8242; addicted people can browse sites with crappy avatars looking at the same stuff. Ermmm, what happens when two people (avatars) want to actually &#8216;touch&#8217; a common site at once? Someone needs to take control and then the experience is hardly &#8217;social&#8217; but more dictatorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3.6 RC1 Coming Very Soon by Browsersphere: Firefox 3.6 RC1 Released</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/firefox-3-6-rc1-coming-very-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9138</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsersphere: Firefox 3.6 RC1 Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=245#comment-9138</guid>
		<description>[...] promised, Firefox 3.6 RC1 was released yesterday.  Despite my warnings against downloading the candidate of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] promised, Firefox 3.6 RC1 was released yesterday.  Despite my warnings against downloading the candidate of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3.6 RC1 Coming Very Soon by Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/firefox-3-6-rc1-coming-very-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=245#comment-9137</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Chrom.  And sorry about the mix-up with the browser identification plug-in.  Unfortunately, I don&#039;t have any control over it, as it was developed by a third party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Chrom.  And sorry about the mix-up with the browser identification plug-in.  Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have any control over it, as it was developed by a third party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome Ad Spotted in England by jr</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/08/google-chrome-ad-spotted-in-england/comment-page-1/#comment-9126</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=249#comment-9126</guid>
		<description>I ran across this photo yesterday http://twitpic.com/wcbee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across this photo yesterday <a href="http://twitpic.com/wcbee" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/wcbee</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #15 by Chrom</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/around-the-browsersphere-15/comment-page-1/#comment-9125</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=247#comment-9125</guid>
		<description>Seen this yet?
http://vocamus.net/dave/?p=955</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen this yet?<br />
<a href="http://vocamus.net/dave/?p=955" rel="nofollow">http://vocamus.net/dave/?p=955</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3.6 RC1 Coming Very Soon by Chrom</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/firefox-3-6-rc1-coming-very-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9124</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=245#comment-9124</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Using   Safari 532.6 on   Mac OS X&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No... this is my Chromium 4.0.266.0 window on Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Using   Safari 532.6 on   Mac OS X</p></blockquote>
<p>No&#8230; this is my Chromium 4.0.266.0 window on Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3.6 RC1 Coming Very Soon by Chrom</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/firefox-3-6-rc1-coming-very-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9123</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=245#comment-9123</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a ton of worthwhile things coming in 3.6.
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Firefox_3.6_for_developers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a ton of worthwhile things coming in 3.6.<br />
<a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Firefox_3.6_for_developers" rel="nofollow">https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Firefox_3.6_for_developers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #15 by Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/around-the-browsersphere-15/comment-page-1/#comment-9121</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=247#comment-9121</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the additional information, Mimas.  I&#039;ve seen quite a few people linking to that post, so it&#039;s a shame the information is misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the additional information, Mimas.  I&#8217;ve seen quite a few people linking to that post, so it&#8217;s a shame the information is misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #15 by Mimas</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/around-the-browsersphere-15/comment-page-1/#comment-9120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=247#comment-9120</guid>
		<description>The link &quot;Initial tests show that forthcoming multi-processor support in Firefox leads to a 3x speedup in JavaScript performance, but even that is still 50% slower than Google Chrome’s performance using the same test.&quot;

is bullshit. Electrolysis doesn&#039;t lead (in its current form) to any bettering in the Sunspider test. The reporter compares to Fx 3.5  and not to Fx 3.6. As he very likely use a Fx 3.5 on a 64-bit OS, JIT wasn&#039;t available on Fx 3.5, but is on its Electrolysis build, hence the bettering he sees.

Minefield 3.7 is currently about 5% quicker on Sunspider than Fx 3.6 which itself is 10% quicker than Fx 3.5. But Fx 3.6 supports JIT for Intel x64, which wasn&#039;t the case on Fx 3.5. On such a build you see the same bettering as Fx 3.0 -&gt; Fx 3.5 showed for other processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link &#8220;Initial tests show that forthcoming multi-processor support in Firefox leads to a 3x speedup in JavaScript performance, but even that is still 50% slower than Google Chrome’s performance using the same test.&#8221;</p>
<p>is bullshit. Electrolysis doesn&#8217;t lead (in its current form) to any bettering in the Sunspider test. The reporter compares to Fx 3.5  and not to Fx 3.6. As he very likely use a Fx 3.5 on a 64-bit OS, JIT wasn&#8217;t available on Fx 3.5, but is on its Electrolysis build, hence the bettering he sees.</p>
<p>Minefield 3.7 is currently about 5% quicker on Sunspider than Fx 3.6 which itself is 10% quicker than Fx 3.5. But Fx 3.6 supports JIT for Intel x64, which wasn&#8217;t the case on Fx 3.5. On such a build you see the same bettering as Fx 3.0 -&gt; Fx 3.5 showed for other processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter Watch #3 by Browsersphere: Around the Browsersphere #15</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2009/12/13/twitter-watch-3/comment-page-1/#comment-9114</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsersphere: Around the Browsersphere #15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=214#comment-9114</guid>
		<description>[...] Iron Browser, which was mentioned here last month, has been reviewed, along with screenshots, over at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iron Browser, which was mentioned here last month, has been reviewed, along with screenshots, over at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3.6 RC1 Coming Very Soon by pd</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/07/firefox-3-6-rc1-coming-very-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=245#comment-9097</guid>
		<description>A candidate for a release candidate? FFS! Just release the mega delayed thing. There&#039;s nothing of interest in it anyway. Move on to doing something worthwhile Mozilla! Stop dragging your arse, IE style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A candidate for a release candidate? FFS! Just release the mega delayed thing. There&#8217;s nothing of interest in it anyway. Move on to doing something worthwhile Mozilla! Stop dragging your arse, IE style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #14 by Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/01/around-the-browsersphere-14/comment-page-1/#comment-8984</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=240#comment-8984</guid>
		<description>No problem.  Thanks for dropping by and for taking the time to comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem.  Thanks for dropping by and for taking the time to comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Around the Browsersphere #14 by Pallab</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2010/01/01/around-the-browsersphere-14/comment-page-1/#comment-8983</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=240#comment-8983</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the linkback. I love following latest browser developments. You have a really nice blog. Watch out Favbrowser :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the linkback. I love following latest browser developments. You have a really nice blog. Watch out Favbrowser <img src='http://browsersphere.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft to Offer Browser Ballot Screen in Europe by Browsersphere: Around the Browsersphere #14</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2009/12/16/microsoft-to-offer-browser-ballot-screen-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-8979</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsersphere: Around the Browsersphere #14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=226#comment-8979</guid>
		<description>[...] that Avant has been listed as one of the browsers to appear on Microsoft&#8217;s browser ballot screen, they need translation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Avant has been listed as one of the browsers to appear on Microsoft&#8217;s browser ballot screen, they need translation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Quick Look at Fennec on Windows by Browsersphere: Around the Browsersphere #14</title>
		<link>http://browsersphere.com/2009/12/19/a-quick-look-at-fennec-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8978</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsersphere: Around the Browsersphere #14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://browsersphere.com/?p=233#comment-8978</guid>
		<description>[...] RC1 build of Fennec, the mobile version of Firefox covered here recently, was released [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RC1 build of Fennec, the mobile version of Firefox covered here recently, was released [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
