Extensions and Bookmark Sync Enabled in Stable Google Chrome Build

Posted on January 25th, 2010 | No Comments »

Google has unleashed extensions and their bookmark sync feature on stable builds of Google Chrome today.  If you’ll remember, the bookmark sync feature was enabled in Windows beta builds back in November, and support for extensions was announced for both Windows and Linux beta builds last month.  It looks like users of stable Chrome builds on Linux and Mac may need to wait a bit, still, however:

To those using Google Chrome on Linux, extensions are enabled on the beta channel. And for those using Google Chrome for Mac, hang tight — we’re working on bringing extensions, bookmark sync and more to the beta soon.

If you’re on Windows, you can either wait to be updated to the new build automatically over the course of the next week, or you can manually upgrade if you want to get your hands on the new features right away.

Once you’ve got the new build, you can head over to Google Chrome Extensions to start extending your browser.  Or you can head on over to the Google Chrome Blog to find out more about what’s included in the new build.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Google Chrome Ad Spotted in England

Posted on January 8th, 2010 | 3 Comments »

I ran across this photo today over on Flickr:

Google Chrome Ad in England

Google Chrome Ad in England

Courtesy of Flickr user KateMonkey.

Tags: , , , , ,

Around the Browsersphere #15

Posted on January 7th, 2010 | 7 Comments »

We’re covering everything from the difference between Yahoo! Answers and Stack Overflow, to Firefox sabotage against IE8 add-ons, to Taco Bell marketing campaigns in this trip around the browsersphere.  Are you ready?

General

Chrome

Fennec

Firefox

Internet Explorer

Opera

The Minor Players

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Minimum Browser Chrome Sizes

Posted on January 1st, 2010 | No Comments »

Even though we’re venturing into edge case territory here, it’s nonetheless interesting to see how the four main web browsers compare when reduced to their minimum chrome, or browser window, size on Windows 7:

minimum_browser_chrome_size_windows_7

I’m not sure what’s more surprising, how large IE is at its most-minimized state, or how small Chrome is.

You can read more about the differences over at Softpedia.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Around the Browsersphere #14

Posted on January 1st, 2010 | 2 Comments »

I’ve been doing my best to keep my finger on the pulse of the browsersphere over on Twitter, but you know you’re not getting the real deal until we go “around the browsersphere.”

General

Chrome

Firefox

Internet Explorer

Opera

Minor Players

There’s a lot more to cover, but that should hold you over until 2010. ;)

Happy New Year, everyone.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lars Bak, the Man Behind Chrome’s V8

Posted on December 27th, 2009 | No Comments »

An article written nine months ago, The genius behind Google’s browser, goes in-depth with the main programmer behind Google Chrome’s v8 JavaScript engine, Lars Bak.  Although the article’s title and certain parts of the story perhaps give a little too much credit to one man (there’s a lot more to Google’s browser than its JavaScript engine), it’s a very interesting read nonetheless.  The following is a short excerpt from the article:

Many computer programs are built using previous versions, or related code, but V8 was started from scratch – a blank slate. When I meet [Kasper] Lund later in my Denmark trip, he takes great delight in underscoring this fact: “It’s the purest form of coding there is.” [Lars] Bak clearly agrees – as Lund speaks, he can’t stop smiling.

Beyond detailing the story behind v8’s development in Denmark, the article gives a personal glimpse at its key creator, something his Wikipedia article doesn’t quite achieve.

If you’re interested in the developers behind the browsers or browser-related technology you probably take for granted on a daily basis, I’d definitely give the well-written The genius behind Google’s browser a read.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Some Google Chrome FUD

Posted on December 18th, 2009 | No Comments »

I’m all for raising privacy concerns, as long as it is done well and responsibly.  However, this morning I stumbled upon a gem of an article that tries to make claims about Google Chrome’s policies that simply aren’t true.  The sad thing is, the only research needed to deny the claims made in the article involves launching the browser and going to a URL.

In Chrome is not an Internet Browser and not open, but closed to the Internet’s Domain Name System, Scott Cleland, a self-proclaimed “prescient analyst,” claims that Chrome is “a gateway to Google’s datacenter to browse Google’s mirror copy of the Internet and track the user’s every movement.”  However, the two most incredible claims in the article are as follows:

  • “Google’s Chrome browser effectively eliminates the Internet’s Domain Name System (DNS) address bar where a user can directly go to [a] URL.”
  • “When one puts a URL, www.brand.com, into Google’s OmniBox search bar they do not go where they asked to go but to Google’s results page where Google can advertise against that brand without sharing the ad revenues with that brand, and where Google can offer competitors an opportunity to divert the user from their requested destination and to a competitor’s destination.”

The claims about Google’s “mirror copy” and bypassing the Internet Domain Name System are discredited point blank in a post from The Chromium Blog titled DNS Prefetching (or Pre-Resolving), which states “Google Chrome resolves domain names…using your computer’s normal DNS resolution mechanism; no connection to Google is used.”

That second bullet point, though, is the most easily discredited.  If you launch Chrome and type “www.starbucks.com” into the OmniBox, you are taken to www.starbucks.com.  You aren’t taken to a search results page and certainly don’t see any competitors offering their services along the way.  If you type only “starbucks” into the OmniBox, that’s a somewhat different story, but the article is making its claim about URLs, which is just flat out wrong.

Perhaps the most concerning fact among all these non-facts is that Scott Cleland is a consultant to Fortune 500 companies and an advisor to Congress! His bio states, “eight different Congressional subcommittees have sought Cleland’s expert testimony.”

He might as well have titled his article “Chrome bypasses the series of tubes.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Around the Browsersphere #13

Posted on December 17th, 2009 | 1 Comment »

I debated whether or not I should skip ahead to #14, but I’m not really that superstitious.

General

Chrome

Firefox

Internet Explorer

Opera

The Minor Players

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Microsoft to Offer Browser Ballot Screen in Europe

Posted on December 16th, 2009 | 4 Comments »

The big news in the browsersphere today is that European regulators have dropped their antitrust case against Microsoft after the company agreed to offer European users of Windows a “ballot screen” allowing them to choose from 11 alternate web browsers.  Internet Explorer will continue to be an option, of course, but the following browsers will also be available as choices for the users:  Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, AOL Explorer, Maxthon, K-Meleon, Flock, Avant Browser, Sleipnir and Slim Browser.

For more on the stipulations of the deal, be sure to read the coverage from The New York Times (via @MaxthonNews).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Twitter Watch #3

Posted on December 13th, 2009 | 2 Comments »

To borrow from Pink Floyd, is there anybody out there?

Ironically enough, Browsersphere has been neglecting the browsersphere a little like Microsoft neglected Internet Explorer earlier this decade.  After all, my last post was way back in June.  However, unlike Microsoft, it isn’t the competition that has jolted this site back to life.  On the contrary, sites like Avencius and Twitter accounts like @AltBrowser have actually made me feel a little bit better about the whole ordeal, knowing that at least someone is out there covering the browsersphere in my absence.  Truth is, the site went dark out of pure laziness on my part.  Well, that and the fact that I’ve been pretty consumed by another project.  Nevertheless, I’m back, and after catching up a bit on what’s been going on, my first order of business is to share a little bit about what’s been tweeted in the browsersphere lately.  So let’s get to it.

That’s it for Twitter Watch #3.  Believe it or not, Twitter Watch #2 was so long ago that I was still using Summize to search for tweets. :)

Before I end this post, since we’re on the subject of Twitter, I should mention that Browsersphere is now on Twitter as well.  Just follow @Browsersphere for real-time updates, links to new site content, etc.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,