Firefox 3.6 RC1 Released

Posted on January 9th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Small Firefox LogoAs promised, Firefox 3.6 RC1 was released yesterday.  Despite my warnings against downloading the candidate of the release candidate earlier this week, it doesn’t look like there was ever more than one candidate, so if you jumped the gun and downloaded that candidate, you’ve likely got the same build anyway.

Despite the fact that Firefox 3.6 RC1 was released on schedule yesterday, it has received very little attention from the usual official outlets, as far as I can tell.  For example, there is no mention of the new release candidate on the main Firefox page, and there has been no mention of the release via Firefox’s Twitter account.

Nevertheless, the RC1 build looks official, and the following are some of its key features and changes:

If you decide to give Firefox 3.6 RC1 a spin, feel free to share your thoughts on the new release here in comments.

Update: I should clarify that the RC1 build is at least mentioned on the beta releases page.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Around the Browsersphere #14

Posted on January 1st, 2010 | 2 Comments »

I’ve been doing my best to keep my finger on the pulse of the browsersphere over on Twitter, but you know you’re not getting the real deal until we go “around the browsersphere.”

General

Chrome

Firefox

Internet Explorer

Opera

Minor Players

There’s a lot more to cover, but that should hold you over until 2010. ;)

Happy New Year, everyone.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Around the Browsersphere #13

Posted on December 17th, 2009 | 1 Comment »

I debated whether or not I should skip ahead to #14, but I’m not really that superstitious.

General

Chrome

Firefox

Internet Explorer

Opera

The Minor Players

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Subtleties of Fetching Images in Web Browsers

Posted on January 26th, 2009 | 2 Comments »

Because HTML is to web browsers what mountains are to mountain bikes (i.e. the former gives purpose to the latter), and being a web designer and developer myself, I like to track what’s going on in the world of HTML almost as much as I like tracking web browsers.  Therefore, I’ve been keeping tabs on the goings-on over at The WHATWG Blog, in an attempt to follow the latest developments with the next major version of HTML, HTML 5.  In doing so, I stumbled upon an interesting bit of information on how web browsers handle the src attribute of an img tag in a recent post:

The problem stems from the following (arguably pointless) markup: <img src=""> A fair number of web pages actually try to declare an image with an empty src attribute. According to the HTTP and URL specifications, this markup means that there is an image at the same address as the HTML document — a theoretically possible but highly unlikely scenario. Internet Explorer apparently catches this mistake and just silently drops the image. Other browsers do not; they will actually try to fetch the image, which results in a “duplicate” request for the page (once to successfully retrieve the page, and again to unsuccessfully retrieve the image).

Apparently some additional language has been added to the HTML 5 specification to make it clear to the developers of user agents (i.e. web browsers) that “ignored self-references” can be safely ignored, therefore making Internet Explorer’s behavior the right behavior according to the spec.

If you’re interested in these bleeding edge changes to the HTML 5 specification and the impact they have on web browsers of the future, I highly recommend following The WHATWG Blog.  I’m also interested in knowing if the audience here (if there still is one ;) ) is interested in reading about these types of things here at Browsersphere.

Tags: , , , ,