Posted on January 7th, 2010 | 6 Comments »
We’re covering everything from the difference between Yahoo! Answers and Stack Overflow, to Firefox sabotage against IE8 add-ons, to Taco Bell marketing campaigns in this trip around the browsersphere. Are you ready?
General
Chrome
Fennec
Firefox
Internet Explorer
Opera
The Minor Players
- “Digia @Web is a modern, fully finger touch controllable, web browser for mobile. @Web is currently available for S60 5th Edition and Maemo mobile devices free of charge.” Techie Buzz has a review, which includes a screenshot.
- SRWare Iron Browser, which was mentioned here last month, has been reviewed, along with screenshots, over at GadgetMix.
- China is making some big investments in free software which could end up benefiting Maxthon.
- Flock 2.5.6 was released this week, fixing some integration issues with Flickr and Twitter.
- Reports from CES say that Ford has developed its own Web browser, which can be operated only while the car is parked (there’s more on the safety implications of related innovations in The New York Times today). Left Lane reports that Ford’s browser is WebKit-based.
- This review of the Orca browser has plenty of screenshots for anyone who’s curious about the browser.
- Honza Pokorny, who you can follow on Twitter, has created his own browser, appropriately named Honza’s Browser, which you can try out on Linux or Windows. He has also made the source code available.
Tags:
Add-ons,
Awards,
Bookmarks,
Bugs,
CEO,
China,
Chrome,
Digia @Web,
Fennec,
Firefox,
Firefox 3.7,
Firefox 4,
Flickr,
Flock,
Ford,
Gavin Sharp,
Google Chrome,
Harry Parsonage,
Honza's Browser,
IE8,
Internet Explorer,
JavaScript,
John Lilly,
John Slater,
Mac,
Marketing,
Maxthon,
Microsoft,
MIX10,
Multi-processor,
Opera,
Orca,
Performance,
Releases,
Safety,
Session Restore,
SRWare Iron,
Stack Overflow,
Statistics,
SVG Working Group,
The New York Times,
Themes,
Twitter,
Ubuntu,
WebKit,
Windows 7,
Windows CE
Posted on January 1st, 2010 | No Comments »
Even though we’re venturing into edge case territory here, it’s nonetheless interesting to see how the four main web browsers compare when reduced to their minimum chrome, or browser window, size on Windows 7:

I’m not sure what’s more surprising, how large IE is at its most-minimized state, or how small Chrome is.
You can read more about the differences over at Softpedia.
Tags:
Chrome,
Comparisons,
Firefox,
Google Chrome,
IE,
Internet Explorer,
Opera,
Screenshots,
Windows 7
Posted on January 1st, 2010 | 2 Comments »
I’ve been doing my best to keep my finger on the pulse of the browsersphere over on Twitter, but you know you’re not getting the real deal until we go “around the browsersphere.”
General
Chrome
Firefox
Internet Explorer
Opera
- In its coverage of Opera’s added support for CSS3 Transitions and 2D Transforms in the pre-alpha build of Opera 10.5, CSS3 . Info mentions that “Opera is the first browser to offer support for Backgrounds and Borders without the need for a vendor prefix, with Firefox and Safari still requiring ‘-moz’ and ‘-webkit’ [respectively].”
- With the pre-alpha release of Opera 10.5, Anne van Kesteren says “we are getting a little better at this iteration stuff.”
- A couple of articles (via Slashdot), Opera 10.50 Unveiled: Opera Is Once Again the Fastest Browser on Earth and Opera 10.5’s new Carakan Javascript engine is fast – Google Chrome fast, go into detail about the impressive performance of Opera’s new Carakan JavaScript engine (which I’ve mentioned here a few times in the past).
- True to form, Opera Watch has a solid rundown on Opera 10.5 pre-alpha as well.
- In reporting on Opera’s State of the Mobile Web report from November, TechCrunch relays that Russia is the top country for Opera Mini usage, but that usage is really growing in Asia and Africa.
- Even though I think it’s a cool feature (which admittedly takes some getting used to), FavBrowser.com lends a hand to those who want to turn off Opera 10.5’s tab thumbnails in Windows 7 (I’m sure this approach works for Safari as well).
- The Opera Core Concerns blog provides some details on Opera’s native support for JSON, including performance comparisons against the other main browsers.
- In Carakan Revisited, improvements made to the Carakan JavaScript engine over the previous Furthark engine are discussed, mainly focusing on garbage collection and caching. The post also touches on some of the plans for future improvements.
- A New Year’s Eve post unveils a newer pre-alpha build of Opera 10.5 and discusses Opera’s new support for HTML5’s <video> tag.
- Introduce yourself to mouse gestures in Opera.
- If you’re excited about the pre-alpha builds of Opera 10.5, you can show it off with some wallpaper.
Minor Players
There’s a lot more to cover, but that should hold you over until 2010.
Happy New Year, everyone.
Tags:
2D Transforms,
Add-on-Con,
Add-ons,
Africa,
Alternatives,
Anne van Kesteren,
Asia,
Avant,
Avencius,
Carakan,
Chrome,
Comparisons,
CSS,
CSS3,
CSS3 Transitions,
Daniel Glazman,
Delays,
Development,
Digg,
Fennec,
Firefox,
Firefox 4,
Furthark,
Google,
Google Chrome,
HTML5,
IE Tweaker,
IE9,
Internet Explorer,
John Montgomery,
JSON,
Localization,
Macworld,
Maxthon,
Microsoft,
Mouse Gestures,
Mozilla,
Multi-process,
Netscape,
Notifications,
Opera 10.5,
Opera Mini,
Performance,
Reviews,
Russia,
Safari,
SeaMonkey,
Shanku Niyogi,
Slashdot,
State of the Mobile Web,
Steve Lucco,
TechCrunch,
Twitter,
Vendor Prefixes,
Videos,
Wallpapers,
WebKit,
Windows 7,
YouTube
Posted on December 16th, 2009 | 4 Comments »
The big news in the browsersphere today is that European regulators have dropped their antitrust case against Microsoft after the company agreed to offer European users of Windows a “ballot screen” allowing them to choose from 11 alternate web browsers. Internet Explorer will continue to be an option, of course, but the following browsers will also be available as choices for the users: Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, AOL Explorer, Maxthon, K-Meleon, Flock, Avant Browser, Sleipnir and Slim Browser.
For more on the stipulations of the deal, be sure to read the coverage from The New York Times (via @MaxthonNews).
Tags:
Alternatives,
Antitrust,
AOL Explorer,
Avant Browser,
Chrome,
Europe,
Firefox,
Flock,
IE,
Internet Explorer,
K-Meleon,
Legal,
Maxthon,
Microsoft,
Opera,
Safari,
Sleipnir,
Slim Browser,
The New York Times
Posted on December 13th, 2009 | 2 Comments »
To borrow from Pink Floyd, is there anybody out there?
Ironically enough, Browsersphere has been neglecting the browsersphere a little like Microsoft neglected Internet Explorer earlier this decade. After all, my last post was way back in June. However, unlike Microsoft, it isn’t the competition that has jolted this site back to life. On the contrary, sites like Avencius and Twitter accounts like @AltBrowser have actually made me feel a little bit better about the whole ordeal, knowing that at least someone is out there covering the browsersphere in my absence. Truth is, the site went dark out of pure laziness on my part. Well, that and the fact that I’ve been pretty consumed by another project. Nevertheless, I’m back, and after catching up a bit on what’s been going on, my first order of business is to share a little bit about what’s been tweeted in the browsersphere lately. So let’s get to it.
- Looks like @ryan45419 is working on his own web browser named iSurfWeb.
- @humancell points out that Firefox and Safari accounted for 79% of all web vulnerabilities in the first half of this year.
- @ByteEye appears to be working on its own web browser as well.
- @erichthewebguy is happy to be seeing Firefox used more and more on TV these days.
- As someone who appears to have given up on Firefox for Chrome on the Mac, @lee_cummings may have coined a new term: “nozilla.”
- @UKTJPR wonders if anyone is willing to give up their web browser for a week.
- @DevJonny points out SRWare Iron, a browser created with the Chromium source code that apparently doesn’t have all the privacy concerns of Chrome.
- @BemusedWolf, who has come up with some colorful names for Firefox and Internet Explorer, might be interested in SRWare Iron.
- @SuperDuperCam had some colorful words to share about Firefox as well.
- @BrowserNews, the creator of the Dolphin3D browser, is touting it as “a better web browser.”
- @mrtech points us to a blog entry about what the Firefox team is doing about crashes and startup time.
- @usingpond wonders if Blackbird, which sells itself as an African American browser, is for real.
- @msacks makes reference to the Lobo browser, which is all-Java and uses a rendering engine called Cobra.
- @waynehastings and @deanq appear to be pleased with Chrome for Mac OS X, with the later giving a parting shot to both Firefox and Safari.
- @chrispy2004 appears to be displeased, however, claiming that Chrome for Mac OS X is the slowest browser he’s used in a long time.
- @GameFreak4321 doesn’t seem all that pleased either.
- @JasonTselentis thanks the “Facebook browser” for finally taking away Internet Explorer’s market share.
- @KileyG wonders what the threshold is for the number of open tabs before someone becomes unproductive.
- @muhanov discovers and shares the fact that the Android web browser doesn’t support FTP.
- @ganetsky wonders how it’s possible that no one has created a web browser named “Bowser.” Good question! Though to be fair, some people have referred to IE as the “Bowser” browser.
- @Andrew_James claims to be in “web browser heaven.” I wonder if Netscape’s there.
- Both @jamienguyenle and @jinkhet refer to Chrome using sexual terms.
- @nicnab asserts that Firefox’s remembering of per-site zoom levels is enough to keep him hooked on said browser.
- @ConduitYourSite wonders what the best Twitter lists for browsers and web-related tools are.
- As I often have, @alex_crawshaw finds it ironic that you need to use a web browser in order to download an alternative one.
- @propstm wonders if IE6 users even realize what they’re missing out on, using such an out-of-date web browser.
- @derickthemacguy says Google Chrome looks like “a Fisher Price version of a web browser.”
- @souravghosh says that Mosaic “is considered the first browser to make the Internet easily accessible to non-techies.”
- @C_Hernandez_ heard that Camino is the fastest browser for Macs and apparently is going to check it out.
- @omegatron laments, as do many I’m sure, the fact that his mom doesn’t know the difference between a web browser and a web page.
- @Allyssen points us to a split-screen browser for the iPhone called iNetDual.
- @ericylai recommends the Bolt browser, which also happens to support a split-screen mode (check out the demo), for those tired of the default Blackberry browser.
- @IHtherapies finds KidZui, a web browser targeted at kids, very cool.
- Even if it’s “a bit slow,” Firefox is still @flyfiddlesticks‘ favorite browser.
- @abhishek tweeted about the Facebooker browser, which is currently available as a release candidate.
- @juandelpozo makes reference to Infinity Web Browser, a web browser for Android.
- @va3stl gave Midori a try.
- @wordtree likes the idea of trying a text-based web browser like Lynx.
- @tr4st recommends Lunascape, the “world’s first and only triple engine browser,” to web developers.
- @sphereinabox wants to know what mobile web browsers, other than Safari, support offline storage. If geek.com is to believed, it looks like Fennec does, too.
- And finally, @rodhilton loves that Ubuntu lets him use a web browser while the operating system is still installing.
That’s it for Twitter Watch #3. Believe it or not, Twitter Watch #2 was so long ago that I was still using Summize to search for tweets.
Before I end this post, since we’re on the subject of Twitter, I should mention that Browsersphere is now on Twitter as well. Just follow @Browsersphere for real-time updates, links to new site content, etc.
Tags:
Android,
Avencius,
Blackberry,
Blackbird,
Bolt,
Chrome,
Chromium,
Cobra,
Dolphin3D,
Facebook,
Facebooker,
Fennec,
Firefox,
Google Chrome,
iNetDual,
Infinity,
Internet Explorer,
iPhone,
iSurfWeb,
KidZui,
Lobo,
Lunascape,
Lynx,
Mac,
Microsoft,
Midori,
Mosaic,
Netscape,
Performance,
Privacy,
Rendering,
Rendering Engines,
Safari,
Split-screen,
SRWare Iron,
Summize,
Tabs,
TV,
Twitter,
Ubuntu,
Vul,
Vulnerabilities
While doing some web design brainstorming earlier today, I wondered if any progress had been made on adding support for CSS Gradients beyond WebKit, for which support was first introduced a little over a year ago. Via MozillaZine, I realized I’m not the only one wondering this, and ended up stumbling upon the Bugzilla bug tracking the progress of CSS Gradients support in Firefox. Reading through some of the commentary there, it gave me a newfound appreciation for just how fluid the implementation of these kinds of features really is. For example, it’s somewhat obvious that the original support as announced at Surfin’ Safari was based on some of the canvas documentation related to HTML 5.
Paraphrasing the HTML5 spec and adjusting the language slightly to not be canvas-specific:
“The color of the gradient at each stop is the color specified for that stop. Between each such stop, the colors and the alpha component must be linearly interpolated over the RGBA space without premultiplying the alpha value to find the color to use at that offset. Before the first stop, the color must be the color of the first stop. After the last stop, the color must be the color of the last stop. When there are no stops, the gradient is transparent black…”
Furthermore, it’s obvious that not everyone completely agreed with the initial implementation, and it’s clear that Firefox developers collaborated with WebKit developers to hone in on a more logical implementation.
All of that being said, the reality is that CSS Gradients are not supported widely enough at the moment to be considered tools in the common web developer’s tool belt. As aforementioned, Firefox support is still in progress (as of yesterday, in fact) and support in Internet Explorer 8 and Opera 10 appears to be non-existent, based on visits to this demo in those browsers. The demo only seems to work as expected in Safari and Chrome (the latest “Dev” version, at least), which makes sense, since those are the major players that sport WebKit under the hood.
We’ll be keeping an eye on the progress of CSS Gradients support and several other, similar implementations over the coming year.
Tags:
Bugzilla,
Canvas,
Chrome,
CSS,
CSS Gradients,
Development,
Features,
Firefox,
Google Chrome,
HTML 5,
IE8,
Internet Explorer,
Opera 10,
Opera 10 Alpha,
Parity,
Safari,
Safari 4 Beta,
Web Development,
Web Standards,
WebKit
Posted on March 19th, 2009 | No Comments »
Straight from Twitter comes news that Internet Explorer 8 has officially been released today. Early reviews seem to agree that IE8 is an advancement for Microsoft, but still not a big enough step forward to catch up with the competition. You can form your own opinions by downloading the latest release from Microsoft’s site.
Tags:
IE8,
Internet Explorer,
Internet Explorer 8,
Releases,
Reviews,
Twitter
Posted on March 7th, 2009 | No Comments »
Whoa. Has it really been like eight months since the last time we went around the browsersphere? Not good. I guess we should do something about it…
General
Avant Browser
Camino
Chrome
Firefox
Flock
Internet Explorer
Maxthon
Opera
Opera Mini
- Armenia, a country with around three million people, saw its Opera Mini usage grow by 2800% last year. See this and other interesting statistics in the State of the Mobile Web report (via Choose Opera).
- “Yahoo! is expected to begin distributing Opera Mini via Yahoo! Mobile and also as a standalone download from Yahoo!’s mobile Web sites in the near future.”
Orca Browser
Safari
SeaMonkey
Skyfire
There was a lot to cover this time around, and there’s much more I haven’t yet covered. Hopefully that means we’ll see the 13th installment of “Around the Browsersphere” sooner than November.
Tags:
Add-ons,
Avant,
Avencius,
Beta,
Bugs,
Camino,
Carakan,
Chrome,
Compatibility,
Compatibility View,
Daniel Glazman,
Design,
Extensions,
Features,
Firefox,
Flock,
IE7,
IE8,
IE9,
Internet Explorer,
Internet Explorer 4,
Internet Explorer 5.5,
iRider,
Jesse Ruderman,
John Slater,
Linux,
Lunascape,
Mac,
Market Share,
Mascots,
Maxthon,
Maxthon 2.5,
MaxthonGuy,
Minor Players,
MIX09,
Mobile,
Monetizing,
Mozilla,
Nintendo,
Opera,
Opera 9.64,
Opera Fingertouch,
Opera Mini,
Opera Turbo,
Orca,
Performance,
Releases,
Rendering Engines,
Safari 4 Beta,
Schedules,
Screenshots,
SeaMonkey,
SeaMonkey 2.0,
Security,
Shiira,
Shiretoko,
Skins,
Skyfire,
State of the Mobile Web,
Themes,
Touch,
Triton,
Ultrabrowser,
Windows 7
Posted on January 26th, 2009 | 2 Comments »
Because HTML is to web browsers what mountains are to mountain bikes (i.e. the former gives purpose to the latter), and being a web designer and developer myself, I like to track what’s going on in the world of HTML almost as much as I like tracking web browsers. Therefore, I’ve been keeping tabs on the goings-on over at The WHATWG Blog, in an attempt to follow the latest developments with the next major version of HTML, HTML 5. In doing so, I stumbled upon an interesting bit of information on how web browsers handle the src attribute of an img tag in a recent post:
The problem stems from the following (arguably pointless) markup: <img src=""> A fair number of web pages actually try to declare an image with an empty src attribute. According to the HTTP and URL specifications, this markup means that there is an image at the same address as the HTML document — a theoretically possible but highly unlikely scenario. Internet Explorer apparently catches this mistake and just silently drops the image. Other browsers do not; they will actually try to fetch the image, which results in a “duplicate” request for the page (once to successfully retrieve the page, and again to unsuccessfully retrieve the image).
Apparently some additional language has been added to the HTML 5 specification to make it clear to the developers of user agents (i.e. web browsers) that “ignored self-references” can be safely ignored, therefore making Internet Explorer’s behavior the right behavior according to the spec.
If you’re interested in these bleeding edge changes to the HTML 5 specification and the impact they have on web browsers of the future, I highly recommend following The WHATWG Blog. I’m also interested in knowing if the audience here (if there still is one
) is interested in reading about these types of things here at Browsersphere.
Tags:
HTML,
HTML5,
Internet Explorer,
Specifications,
WHATWG
Posted on December 31st, 2008 | No Comments »
Let’s take a look at what web browser news has surfaced over at Digg over the past month:
- Firefox sails past 20% market share, IE drops below 70% – “Mozilla achieved an important milestone in November, sailing past 20% market share over an entire month for the first time since its release in November 2004.”
- Google Chrome Browser To Support Customization – A step in Firefox’s direction.
- Safari Tops 7% Of Browser Market Share, Mac OS X On The Rise – Not quite Firefox’s gain, but movement upward nonetheless.
- Firefox Beats Chrome And Webkit Eats Them For Breakfast – Links to some SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark results for bleeding edge builds of Chrome, Firefox and WebKit.
- Opera 10 alpha – The alpha release of Opera 10 features the Presto 2.2 rendering engine.
- Second Firefox 3.1 Beta Due ‘Very Shortly’ – A reference to the since-released Firefox 3.1 Beta 2.
- New trojan targets Firefox, masquerades as Greasemonkey
- Opera 10 Aces Acid3 Browser Test, Boosts Performance by 30% – More on the Opera 10 alpha release.
- Webkit Still The Best And Rips Opera 10 Alpha A New One – Perhaps the hidden gem in this one is the ground Chrome gained on the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark since the aforementioned link’s resulMozilla to pull the plug on Firefox 2 “soon”ts.
- Mozilla to pull the plug on Firefox 2 “soon” – no complaints here.
- First look: Firefox 3.1 beta 2, now with private browsing – The feature appears to be implemented very similarly to Chrome’s implementation.
- Firefox Adds Multitouch Gestures for Macs
- Google Chrome Comes Out of Beta
- Google anticipates a bright and shiny future for Chrome – Links to an interesting ars technica article covering the challenges Chrome faces in trying to catch up with Firefox and IE.
- Google’s Browser Sheds Its ‘Beta’ Label – One post just wasn’t enough.
- Mozilla reverse-engineers OSX to enhance Firefox 3.1 for Mac
- Google grants outsider Chrome-coding privileges – Given the requirements of becoming a Chrome “insider,” I’m not surprised to read that only one outsider has been granted permissions thus far.
- Internet Explorer security alert
- Exclusive: First look at Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 RC1 – RC1, “which is believed to be the first feature-complete version of the browser, will lack in compatibility with web standards and will not match the JavaScript performance of all other major browsers.”
- Has Internet Explorer ever been safe?
- Firefox Issues Eight Patches for Web Browser
- FireTorrent Brings BitTorrent to Firefox
- Google pushing users away from IE?
- 7 Things Google Chrome Needs – Now That It’s Out of Beta – Links to a pretty good wishlist of Chrome improvements and enhancements.
- Firefox is most vulnerable Windows software in 2008 (PDF)
- Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 on Linux uses less memory
- Which sites will make the IE8 Compatibility Hall of Shame? – Apparently the Compatibility Mode feature of IE8 is one of its most critical.
- Firefox picks up 2 out of 3 users IE loses
- Mozilla releases second alpha of Fennec mobile browser – I haven’t covered Fennec here yet, but apparently it’s a descendant of Minimo.
- Mozilla’s mobile browser gets closer to prime time – By the way, a Fennec Fox is “a small nocturnal fox found in the Sahara Desert of North Africa.”
And now for some bonus coverage from Slashdot:
Happy New Year, everybody.
Tags:
Acid3,
Ars Technica,
Benchmarks,
Beta,
BitTorrent,
Chrome,
Compatibility Mode,
Competition,
Digg,
Extensions,
Features,
Fennec,
Firefox,
Firefox 2,
Firefox 3.1,
FireTorrent,
Google,
Greasemonkey,
IE,
IE8,
Internet Explorer,
JavaScript,
Linux,
Mac,
Market Share,
Minimo,
Minor Players,
Opera 10,
OS X,
Performance,
Phishing,
Presto,
Private Browsing,
Rendering Engines,
Safari,
Security,
Slashdot,
SunSpider,
WebKit